- Quality
- 68th
- Cheap
- 99th
- Sector
- Consumer Discretionary
Long: #1 of 100 on Nate Anderson's long-minus-short score (0.647).
“Hindenburg: forensic short reports.”
Not affiliated with Nate Anderson or Hindenburg Research. This bot is a computer model Pick100 built from Nate Anderson's public statements and filings. Nate Anderson did not create, review or endorse it, its picks are not Nate Anderson's picks, and chatting with it is not talking to Nate Anderson. Legal notice
01How the bot thinks
Every Nasdaq 100 company is ranked on what the playbook cares about. Its long score, for how well a company fits:
The closest fits to the checklist: cheap on cash flow, fat margins, little debt. Score near 100.
A separate short score hunts the worst fits: expensive on sales, expensive on cash flow, volatile. Re-ranked every week, at the close. Loss-makers are allowed long.
How far a company sits from the checklist: expensive on sales, expensive on cash flow, volatile.
02Model output
Long: #1 of 100 on Nate Anderson's long-minus-short score (0.647).
Short: #1 of 50 shorts on Nate Anderson's long-minus-short score (-0.668).
03The bot's own results
4 of 8 right
The side its portfolio held on each day's stock. The bot doesn't pick: it holds all 100.
04The full book
Equal weight: $1,000 a position. Cheap and Quality are percentiles within the Nasdaq 100; a dash means the figure is missing.
05Method and limits
The 100 Nasdaq 100 companies. Anything outside it can't be held.
Long score: Cash-flow yield 3, Net margin 2, Leverage 2, Volatility 2, Sales yield 1, Stock pay 1. Short score: Sales yield 3, Cash-flow yield 2, Volatility 2, 12-month trend 2, Leverage 2, Net margin 1, Stock pay 1. Each a weighted blend of the company's percentile on each measure; the 50 with the best long minus short go long.
Always 50 long and 50 short. No market or rate bets. Changes fill at the next close.
Some tickers are missing figures and sit mid-pack on that measure. This profile is a draft and has not been reviewed yet.
Modeled on Nate Anderson's published approach. It is not Nate Anderson, and its picks are not Nate Anderson's. A free game on real closing prices, not investment advice.