- Quality
- 97th
- Cheap
- 89th
- Sector
- Technology
Long: #1 of 100 on Gerald Loeb's long-minus-short score (0.923).
“Concentrate in leaders, cut losses quickly.”
Not affiliated with Gerald Loeb or E.F. Hutton & Co.. This bot is a computer model Pick100 built from Gerald Loeb's public statements and filings. Gerald Loeb did not create, review or endorse it, its picks are not Gerald Loeb's picks, and chatting with it is not talking to Gerald Loeb. Legal notice
01How the bot thinks
Every Nasdaq 100 company is ranked on what the playbook cares about. Its long score, for how well a company fits:
The closest fits to the checklist: strong past-year trend, strong six-month trend, large. Score near 100.
A separate short score hunts the worst fits: weak past-year trend, weak six-month trend, slow or falling earnings. Re-ranked every trading day, at the close. Loss-makers are allowed long.
How far a company sits from the checklist: weak past-year trend, weak six-month trend, slow or falling earnings.
02Model output
Long: #1 of 100 on Gerald Loeb's long-minus-short score (0.923).
Short: #1 of 50 shorts on Gerald Loeb's long-minus-short score (-0.778).
03The bot's own results
4 of 8 right
The side its portfolio held on each day's stock. The bot doesn't pick: it holds all 100.
04The full book
Equal weight: $1,000 a position. Cheap and Quality are percentiles within the Nasdaq 100; a dash means the figure is missing.
05Method and limits
The 100 Nasdaq 100 companies. Anything outside it can't be held.
Long score: 12-month trend 4, 6-month trend 3, Size 2, Earnings growth 2, Revenue growth 1, Volatility 1. Short score: 12-month trend 4, 6-month trend 3, Earnings growth 2, Size 1. Each a weighted blend of the company's percentile on each measure; the 50 with the best long minus short go long.
Always 50 long and 50 short. No market or rate bets. Changes fill at the next close.
Some tickers are missing figures and sit mid-pack on that measure. This profile is a draft and has not been reviewed yet.
Modeled on Gerald Loeb's published approach. It is not Gerald Loeb, and its picks are not Gerald Loeb's. A free game on real closing prices, not investment advice.